Showing posts with label Philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philosophy. Show all posts

Monday, January 7, 2013

The Man by the Mountain




Froheburg was a simple village. Nestled in the shadow of a single hill, it had a school and a butcher and a movie theater and even a fast food restaurant. The village was composed of a fairly diverse population and many people owned pets, with the majority of pet owners being dog owners. Importantly, the majority of Froheburg’s general population was not dog owners. There were no dog parks in the village. Froheburg taxpayers did not feel a dog park was the best use of government money. Instead, the town was enjoying the new, publicly funded statue of Manchester United footballer Eric Cantona. Dogs were encouraged not to defecate near the publicly funded statue of Eric Cantona.

The grass of Froheburgian lawns was unique in that it was all dead and brown from the unregulated urination of the village’s dog population.

A few miles from the town proper, where the grass began to get a little bit greener, a single hut stood. It was a rickety hut, built centuries ago, with planks that were rotting before construction began. It housed a single occupant, although sometimes its drooping eaves gave shelter to another lone being, who only waited and never entered. Crowds of people would gather near the hut, but they would always keep a safe distance between themselves and the decaying pile of lumber.

Today the man who lived in the hut was named Walter. Walter had wanted to become the man who lived in the hut on the mountain since he was a young boy. And now he was that man. He stayed in the hut during the entirety of the night. Promptly with the rising of the sun, Walter would squeeze himself through a gap between a pair of slats in the front of the hut. He would stretch for roughly five minutes. Then he would walk. He would walk around the hill with no break until the precise moment the sun set. He would then return to his hut, squeezing himself through a different gap between a different pair of slats in a different location on a different wall of his hut. Then he would eat his only meal of the day, a rustic but extensive feast provided to him by a generous benefactor living in the village.

Everything Walter did was part of a long ago enshrined tradition. Even his route around the hill was the result of an infallible custom. He would walk three times clockwise (his hut serving as the “12” position of the clock face of course) around the hill, staying roughly two hundred meters from its peak. Then he would walk counterclockwise, this time about four hundred meters from the hill’s peak. Then he would sprint as fast as possible to the peak of the hill and cartwheel head over heels all the way down to the bottom. Then he would walk back to his hut and repeat the procedure.

Walter was what he always dreamed he would be. His parents were immeasurably proud of him. His village was understandably grateful that he was able to fulfill such a necessary service.

Walter’s position was greatly envied among Froheburgians. Crowds would gather to pay their respects to their greatest citizen. Heirs to the title would spend years waiting outside the hut, observing a master at work until their call to duty was announced.

Walter was protecting a great good from a terrible evil. That is what was contained deep within the hill. It was the greatest, best thing and it had to be kept out of the hands of the worst. So it was buried beneath this great hill eons ago and a watchman was posted to keep guard over it. It’s an important job…

Actually, the hill contains some really evil, powerful, bad and evil thing. The hill and Walter serve to keep this evil where it belongs: buried under a hill in near some indistinct, pee-stained village. And it’s super important. Maybe. Nobody in Froheburg is really sure. But it’s really important.

Never, in the recorded history of Froheburg, has anyone come to dig up their hill and either destroy the good that it protects or release the evil that it contains.

Walter knows why.

Should he smile from pride or cry in shame?

Monday, December 3, 2012

We’re the Same but Different



Jude was a flower, a sunflower. He lived in a field of sunflowers. Jude’s petals were bright yellow and he had a lot of them. His cluster of stamens, right in the center of his face, was brown. His stem was green and his stem had leaves.

Right next to Jude was Tommy. On his other side was Jane. In front of him was Michael and behind was Patrice. Like Jude, each of his four neighbors had a lot of yellow leaves. Their stamens were brown. Their stem was green and all of them had leaves. All five of them needed sunlight, not too much, but just enough. They all also needed plenty of water.

Jude reassured himself constantly that he was different. And to an extent, he was.

There was a notch in one of his petals, a notch that he had never seen duplicated in any other petal. If you looked closely, just to the right of center, you could see a very, very faint speck of red among the otherwise perfect field of brown. Jude had never heard of anyone else have such a red speck.

And Jude found that he could stand just a bit more heat than any of his neighbors. Of course, he would wither away if it got too hot, but there were times when those around him were complaining of the oppressive sun and Jude would feel fine.

See? Jude was different. And these differences should be considered whenever we think of Jude, whenever we make a judgment about Jude.

But what Jude didn’t know was that, if viewed from a sufficient height, he would be indistinguishable in a blurry field of yellow.

***

The paradox of human similarity, I think, was adequately summarized by my sister one Christmas morning about 15 years ago. We both received new yo-yos that holiday season. And they were the same. Besides the fact that they were both yo-yos, served the same purpose and were both attached to string, the yo-yos were the same design, made by the same company and formed from the same hard plastic. They had the same gold lettering etched into their sides. Except mine was blue and hers was red. “Chris! We got yo-yos,” she shouts from an old video-cassette. “And they’re the same…but different!”

It is fascinating how similar we are. Over 99% of our genes are shared. So are physical features like hands, feet, noses and skin. We walk on two feet. We have opposable thumbs. We have sexual organs. Every human (or every not mentally-ill human) appears capable of feeling some form of love.

It is also fascinating how arbitrarily we differentiate ourselves. People are discriminated against because of skin color, nose shape, sexual organ type or whom they love.

Taking into consideration how similar any human being is to another, it is further fascinating to consider how important these differences can be. Any bigoted person is about a million times more similar to any person of the group against which he is bigoted than that bigot is similar to, say, an anglerfish.

Yet how many slurs do humans have for anglerfish?

Similarities seem to magnify differences. Human philosophers, theologians and lawmakers have long been obsessed with establishing and justifying objective standards, operating with the belief that humans are essentially the same (which, depending on perspective, they are). So they’ve established codes which create a universal standard and enforce that standard evenly across an assumed to be homogeneous population.

Of course that homogeneous population is not homogeneous. Despite being “essentially” the same, despite being so similar that differences are in many case imperceptible, humans are not the same. So should we still be searching for objectivity or for universality? Should those who are different be forced to adjust to fit the whims of whichever truth we as a society has decided to be universally applicable.[1] Should differently shaped cogs be ground into uniformity against the machine of society, or should their uniqueness be preserved?

What is the more important: the fact that every human being on the planet earth has a nose, ears, eyes and a mouth or the fact that each human being has a different nose, ears, eyes and mouth than any other?

I, personally, like different. Of course I may prove to be too much of a relativist to impose that standard on anyone else.


[1] Of course we must admit that these truths change. After all, most of us now agree that darker skinned races are not inherently inferior to their lighter skinned counterparts. And it only took almost the entirety of human civilization to come to this reasonable conclusion.