Showing posts with label harry potter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label harry potter. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Snape’s Redemption



I stumbled across this picture while browsing reddit, so this isn’t a completely random post written years after the conclusion of the Harry Potter series. I mean it is, but it isn’t random to me.

Snape is an interesting character. He’s smart and witty and (for most of the series) he is completely and nearly irredeemably evil. He is irredeemable because, although Snape doesn’t spend the entirety of the books as the villain (even before the grand reveal in the final novel), Harry Potter, the character through the events of the story are filtered never comes to trust him. In the Sorcerer’s Stone, Harry accuses Snape of performing some elaborate curse on his broom to kill him, or worse: ruin Gryffindor’s chances to win the House Quidditch Cup.

Then, at the end of the story, Harry, Ron and Hermione learn that Professor Quirrel was performing the curse and it was Snape who saved Harry’s life by performing the necessary counter curse to keep Harry’s broom in the air. Hermione latches onto this, Snape’s first redemptive quality, and internalizes it for the rest of the story. She is the only one of the trio and her belief in Snape is quickly labeled as a naïve trust in all things authorial and professorial. Harry continues to see Snape well within the spectrum evil, even after Snape saves him from Barty Crouch Jr. at the end of the Goblet of Fire and even while Snape is teaching Harry Occulmency to protect his mind from Voldemort in the Order of the Phoenix. Every single one of Harry’s assertions, and everyone else’s suspicions about the Snape’s true nature are confirmed when he kill Albus Dumbledore.

It just goes to show you that you should never ever trust a biased narrator.

Because we eventually learn the truth about Snape, his motivations and his place in the battle between good and evil. And, most importantly, we learn that love was the key to it all. Snape’s love for Lily Potter was what drove him from Voldemort and the Death Eaters. It was what convinced Dumbledore to put his absolute, highest trust in Snape. It is what convinced the Potions professor to die so Harry Potter could die…and then live, again.

And thus, finally, Severus Snape is wholly redeemed. One of Harry’s children is named in his honor. Fans clamor around the hero they once reviled. You see, he was a double agent the whole time! His soul, quite unlike his greying, frayed underpants, is in fact pure and clean. And so the people draw the kinds of pictures seen above, of Severus slouching against the Mirror of Erised with his one true dream, his only love trapped in the glass behind him, immortalizing what was once an unimaginable perspective of Severus Snape.

Wrap a bow on that folks, because that’s the moral of this story. Love conquers all. Lily’s love for Harry protected him from Voldemort’s killing curse. Snape’s love for Lily allowed Harry to avenge Voldemort’s death. Rowling wants us to cheer for him.

But I still hate him.

In my eyes, Snape is still that slimy, jealous prick who I reviled for the first six novels of the series. His story has an added twist and it makes it particularly tragic and even sympathetic because imagine loving someone and never being able to requite that love. Imagine watching your childhood crush date, marry and have a child with your childhood bully. Then imagine joining an organization of pure evil, pitting yourself against the single person you ever claimed to love. Imagine standing by as your comrades kill thousands, torment millions of innocent wizards and defenseless muggles, again as the one person you love struggles to fight against you.

Sure, it was a mistake. He let the spite he felt for James to consume him. He allowed that hatred to overpower the love he harbored for Lily. Then Severus spent the rest of his life in an attempt to fix it. And maybe that’s the point. He fought for the redemption of an entirely irredeemable act because of a love that was once so easily squashed by hatred. And we are convinced he is redeemed?

He can’t be redeemed, not in my eyes. Snape was as much, if not more, motivated by guilt and regret as he was by love. Lily was gilded by the memories the two shared and precious to Snape. But their relationship never survived through adolescence. One of the memories Harry sees during the Order of the Phoenix is one of the final interactions we see between Snape and Lily. After Lily convinces James to extinguish his Levicorpus spell, Snape shouts at her. He calls her a filthy mudblood. And he storms away.

People can talk about mistakes. People can talk about getting lost in a moment. People can convince themselves that change is possible. But you cannot persuade me to think that Snape does not absolutely hate with a boiling passion Lily in that moment. He hurls this horrible epithet at the only one he loves and then he retreats to a place he doesn’t come back from until her death.

What makes Snape so horrible to me, what makes him irredeemable (as I have so many times called him) is that he gave up. He didn’t love Lily, at least not enough to actually love her, not enough to keep her away from James, not enough to protect her from Voldemort. He convinced himself, possibly after a long and drawn out mental exercise, that he hated her, that he couldn’t love her, that she was exactly what he called her down by the lake, that she was a filthy, vermin mudblood.

That is his sin. He didn’t kill Lily Potter. He didn’t kill James either, although he must have wanted to. He isn’t even guilty of murdering Dumbledore (unless you haven’t finished Deathly Hallows). He gave up on love. He gave up on himself. And when he realized the grave error that he had made, it was much too late to make it right.

Monday, January 14, 2013

Caring: A Fan's Journey


Caring: A Fan’s Journey

There's always a line of freaks somewhere waiting for some kind of freakshow. Sometimes the line is filled with wizard hats and wands. Sometimes it's filled with teenaged girls in vampire makeup. Sometimes there are a bunch of lightsabers and Stormtroopers. Sometimes the people in the line are way too excited to see the new Ford Mustang. Sometimes there is nothing to see but fat middle aged men wearing nothing but sports-themed body paint. But they're not freaks. They're fans.

And they're too loud, and they're obnoxious and whatever it is that they care about is actually stupid and childish and meaningless. But that doesn't mean you can fault them for caring.

I was a fan, a football fan, and a big one for that matter - as much as it pains me to admit. I yelled and cheered. I wore color coordinated outfits to show my sport. I (typically) stomped around like a sugar-starved two year old whenever things went wrong for me...I mean my team...I mean the team that I arbitrarily chose to root for, but had no actual connection to.

I look back on my teenaged years, when my fandom was strongest, like an ashamed alcoholic recounts a particularly exciting month in Vegas. The sports themed bed sheets, the picture of a quarterback which hangs in my bedroom in the spot normally reserved for Jesus, those are my embarrassing tattoos, my secret stories of desperate addiction. Because I convinced myself that caring about something so ultimately trivial was both a waste of my time and a black smudge on my character.

I have that kind of compulsive, addictive personality that seems to bounce between extremes anyway. My impulse, when hearing a song that I enjoy for the first time, is to find it online. I listen to it roughly 100 times until I have its lyrics memorized, then I listen to it roughly 100 more times until I can sing along, pitch perfect.

These are the ingredients for the type of person who rereads the Harry Potter novels time and time again. Or the type of person who can act out funny scenes from Seinfeld by memory. Or (in my case) the type of person who spends more time reading, listening and talking about football than he does anything else besides sleep. This is what makes a fan. (Full disclosure: I also am a big fan of both Seinfeld and Harry Potter, so those other things apply to me as well.)

But I gave it up. Part of me was tired of the emotional investment required of the Fan. Part of me was tired of being hurt by my team's losses. The largest part of me was tired of feeling stupid for being so affected by something so disconnected from me, something which could neither directly affected me, nor could I (despite all my lucky outfits and sacred couches) directly affect. So I stopped caring about football and started following politics intensely.

I lasted less than a year. I went just about 10 months without watching a game, wearing a replica jersey or listening to some pompous sports radio host pontificate about the playoff failings of Peyton Manning. Because the playoffs started and that aforementioned team with which I forged an arbitrary and meaningless but very personally important bond was in them. So I dug my lucky socks out of a long-forgotten drawer and walked back into my personal opium den. And I feel pretty good about it.

I can imagine that my situation is head scratching for many, those passionless, cynical and toilsome. Beliebers, Twihards, Deadheads, cosplayers, LARPers, historical reenactors and all the rest of them are so confusing, because why? That's literally the only question. Why care so much about something that matters so little? Why fight and argue and spend money on what is nothing more than a leisure activity? Why not get a job or raise a family or make friends or travel around the world?

Good question. Of course the nihilist within me can only turn it back on the interrogator. Why care about anything, be it money or careers or teen pop idols or Super Bowl championships? Is it more important to care about the right thing (whatever the flying fuck that is) than to care about something?

Why not care about the things you care about and leave it at that?