I know this is a little late.
But I watched the debate for a second time last night, and I
have to say, the second watching did not help me any.
It was a debate filled with small surprises, not many shocks
(obviously due to the tight ship collectively run by the “bi-partisan” Debate
Commission – where bi-partisan means “don’t bring up anything controversial for
either candidate or that candidate will throw a tantrum and drop out of the
debate”). We had some Big Bird, many assurances to the elderly along a
shit-load of bullshit and pandering.
But I could not figure out what was going on with Barrack
Obama during the debate. He seemed, depending on your propensity to spin left,
somewhere between “overly calm and relaxed” and “tired and underprepared.”
Perhaps he thought the campaign was over after Romney insulting and writing off
nearly half the country during a private fundraiser became public. Perhaps he
did not expect Romney’s campaign staff to slip a few teaspoons of cocaine into
his afternoon tea, in order to give him a little more pep.
Obama is Mr. Charisma, not to say that he doesn’t have facts
or arguments structured on logic or empirical data. It is just that the man’s
one-word essence is charisma. That is how he coasted to a victory in 2008. Like
Usain Bolt at the Olympics of the same year, Obama destroyed McCain with an
early lead and then seemed to float to the inevitable. And that early lead,
that initial destruction of his opponent was centered around his energy. He
made the maverick McCain, who – by the way – is still feisty as ever in the
Senate, look like a crippled, wrinkled retiree.
But last night that energy was gone. Maybe he just wasn’t
“feeling it.” Maybe he was taken by surprise by Romney’s own energy and joie de
vivre.
Wait a minute! Maybe Romney hired a secret corporation to
break into the White House during the night before the debate and steal Obama’s
charisma like in some sci-fi movie. Then, minutes before taking the stage, the
Obama energy was consumed by Romeny! That’s it, either that or Romney took an
assload of uppers and Obama forgot to sleep for the last week.
But I did not find Obama’s missing personality to be the
most confusing aspect of Wednesday’s debate. That spot was reserved for Romney.
To me, this man is an enigma, not just over this campaign,
but over his entire political career. He starts fairly moderate in his 1994
race against Ted Kennedy for the Senate. Then he is moderate, but a little to
the right when he runs for governor of Massachusetts. Then he becomes governor
and shifts much more significantly to the right. Then he becomes a
near-fundamentalist, Tea Party extremist during his current campaign.
Then last night, everything changed. The largest point of
confusion I encountered was that , suddenly, he was preaching about lowering
the tax burden on the lower and middle classes while raising the rates on
wealthier citizens. For most of the past few months, at least to my knowledge,
Romney’s platform seemed very much in line what we all are forced to call the
“Republican” party platform. More Bush Tax cuts, subsidies to oil and natural
gas companies, cuts to entitlements, cuts to education and welfare, more
defense spending.
Then, last night, he spoke about slowly tapering off social
security and medicare spending, rather than taking a hatchet to it as he and
his running mate Paul “The Conservative Intellect” Ryan had spoken about,
again, for the last few months. He refused to agree with Obama’s assertion that
his economic plan would increase kill-machine spending (colloquially referred
to as “defense spending”) by multiple trillions of dollars. He also completely
side-stepped the issue of his tax cuts, again refusing to address Obama’s claim
that the Romney plan would cut tax revenues by about 5 trillion dollars.
I have to disagree with those who claim that Romney “won”
the debate last night. Perhaps he won the battle, but if he continues fighting
this way, he may lose the war. Sure, in the short term, some undecided voters
(like myself) may be convinced to support this new, much less radically
Republican Romney. But he has a Massachusetts campaign gives him a definite
history of going back on many of the campaign promises he makes, perhaps more
so than the average politician. Objectively examining this history may indicate
to some voters that Romney has not trouble lying to get into office and then
throwing his campaign promises away and becoming something else entirely once
he is elected.
Regardless of how moderate voters react to this new Romney,
I think that if he spends the last month of his campaign completely
undercutting the policies he espoused during the last six months of his
campaign, Romney will very likely alienate his base of supporters, the ones who
got , and most likely lose the election.
Re: your final paragraph, don't count on it!
ReplyDelete